I did some research on languange and tried to look for repeating patterns and concepts, i found things that changed my perception not just of people but also reality and consciousness, i saw how it could be used for both building and destroying, people, thoughts, beliefs, philosophies, i found this "tool" out of a sense of severe danger and it did something quite awful to the way i started to look at people/speech, words became nothing but some kind of "puzzle" to solve, i would look at something and often but not always feel that something is off/wrong and this feeling that what people are saying is "off" or "wrong" is a feeling i had for many years and just got stronger as time moved on, and this feeling became so strong i developed this method that i named "word engineering" and i think this is a pretty good term for what decievers do to make obvious lies look like truths and make people like me very unhappy, the good thing is telling lies or false observations always has weak points, that i have come to refer to as "screws" which is a refrence to syntheziser knobs, sometimes finding these screws would be immediate and sometimes it takes a bit of time, the important thing to keep in mind is to not to get distracted by the endless vagueness of day to day life/politics situations and speak and percieve from the core principles that underlies these false reasonings and statements "one should not rip out weeds endlessy and instead look for why the weeds grow in the first place" would be an easy reminder to keep in mind, here is an example of a common opinion that has its roots in false principles, first principles i have referd to as "bones" as in the bones of a skeleton that holds the structure, "why did they vote for president x and not president y?"

a good response wouldnt be "oh you see this president i voted for is good for the economy the other one willmake us poor" if you respond like this the person will just say "i have seen on x that president x will actually make us rich and president y will make us poor" and then you will respond "but i heard on y that president y might make us poor but everyone will get free school" and they will respond "what is the point of free school if everyone is poor?" and then you will say "what is the point of being rich if there is nothing to learn" etc etc it can go like this endlessy and you will not have changed your opinion and they will not have changed their opinion because both of you have different needs that want to be met but in the end its either "x or y" and a large percentage of the population is forced to live with less happiness than the other large percentage which doesnt sound like a stable society in the long term if there is always a large percentage of the poplution that is not happy with something, you see, the example i gave is quite simplistic compared to real politics which makes it even more difficult to come to a unified agreement as efficienty and stable as possible, so instead of spending years of arguing and achieving nothing why not take a step back and look why one has to argue so much in the first place or rather why so many people with so many different goals, needs, and desires always have to choose between either x or y, and the whole championship system doesnt make sense either because in the end its going to be x or y and either way there are going to be alot of people who will be very unhappy about x or y, now i can already predict the most obvious response to this "you cant change society from this fundemental level you have to work with what is already there" [continued in the next post]